Mass Migration is Causing Britain to SUFFER

Ahmad Mulakhil, “targeted” the child after spotting her in a park in Nuneaton.
Total
0
Shares

Ahmad Mulakhil, a 23 year old who arrived via the scenic small boat route from France in March 2025, has just been found guilty of raping a 12 year old girl. You really have to admire the efficiency of the man. He managed to secure his spot in the UK and commit “horrific sexual offences” all within the span of four short months.

During his trial at Warwick Crown Court, the jury heard how Mulakhil laughed while attacking the child in a quiet cul-de-sac. When the police questioned him, he offered the classic, totally believable defense that he thought the primary school aged girl was actually 19. He even claimed she was the one who initiated the encounter. It is a bold strategy to blame a child for your own lack of self control, but it did not quite land with the jury.

Tears in the Dock

After the verdict, the tough guy persona crumbled. Mulakhil spent his time in the dock crying and blowing his nose. Perhaps he realised that the “problems” he claimed to have back in Afghanistan are nothing compared to the reception he will get in a British prison. Judge Kristina Montgomery KC noted that his “substantial” sentence will make him eligible for deportation. We can only hope the Home Office finds a working pen to sign those papers when the time comes.

The Great Silence

The case caused a bit of a stir in Nuneaton, mostly because the authorities decided that the public did not need to know the immigration status of the suspects. Warwickshire Police stuck to their “national guidance” like a child holding a security blanket, refusing to mention that the men were asylum seekers. This prompted Nigel Farage to pop up and scream “cover up” from the rooftops.

It turns out that when you hide facts from the public, they tend to get a bit annoyed. The backlash was so loud that the government actually had to change the rules. Now, police are encouraged to disclose nationality and ethnicity in high profile cases. It is amazing what a few widespread protests can do for transparency.

The “System” is Working, Apparently

A Home Office spokesperson promised that they will not allow “foreign criminals” to exploit the laws. They are talking about sweeping reforms and replacing the “broken appeals system.” We have heard that tune before, but maybe this time they will actually find the “off” switch for the illegal migration magnet.

While the council spokespeople talk about “liaising with the community” and acknowledging how “upsetting” this all is, a young girl has to live with the memory of a man who thought her trauma was a punchline.

Mulakhil is now waiting for his sentencing date next month. He might find that the “quiet cul-de-sacs” of the UK prison system are a lot less welcoming than the ones he targeted in Warwickshire.

Key Criticisms

  • Mainstream media — Accused of being bias, misrepresentation (e.g., labelling events “far-right” or “racist” despite friendly atmospheres and diverse attendees), and selective editing to associate patriots with trouble. Independent journalism, shows unfiltered reality.

  • Mass migration — Most arrivals were from Middle Eastern/African countries (Syria, Afghanistan, Eritrea, Ethiopia), with poor integration (no English, no work after years), lack of vetting, and disproportionate benefits/housing compared to natives or hardworking earlier migrants. The UK a “dumping ground” for unwanted people and warns of cultural erasure, incompatibility, and rising danger (e.g., grooming gangs, crime spikes near migrant hotels).

  • Two-tier policing/justice — Examples include lenient treatment of armed groups vs. harsh arrests of elderly protesters, light sentences for serious migrant crimes vs. heavy ones for speech offences, and failures to deport offenders.

  • Grooming gangs — Industrial-scale abuse enabled by fear of “racism” accusations and multiculturalism prioritising optics over child safety. Muslim community to condemn it openly, criticising silence as compliance.

  • Islam’s compatibility — Islamic ideology incompatible with Western values (e.g., women’s rights, freedom of speech, age of consent), though peaceful, assimilated Muslims can coexist by adapting.

  • Anti-white sentiment — Active attack on English/British culture and white people (e.g., flag-waving labeled racist, veterans neglected while migrants housed in hotels), arguing Christians should defend victims of injustice regardless of race.

Related Topics: Europe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like